![]() All the necessary degrees of freedom are there. It's like if someone asked for a standard to send mail, and instead of SMTP they came up with "The English Language." All the necessary degrees of freedom are there, but it doesn't constrain the problem space, so it's almost completely useless as a standard.ĮDIT: No, that's too simple, a lot of people already speak The English Language. ![]() But everything still has to be built out of the lego pieces the architecture astronauts came up with, of course. Which means that all of the decisions wind right back up in the implementer's lap, and the implementer has to sort out the compatibility matrix the old fashioned way, one compatible partner stack at a time. It isn't so much a "standard" as an anthology of visions for wireless connectivity, each of which delegates all of the important decisions to the layer above. The bluetooth standard is very heavy on the architecture astronaut factor and light on the specification. You may have to select a menu option or click a button.Oh, standards were a guidance back then? You had it good!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |